Versal PL NVMe SSD Speed Test

Hands down, the best solution for non-volatile storage on Versal designs, is NVMe solid-state drives. One of the main reasons why they are such a good fit is because they interface with the host device over PCI Express. Versal Prime, AI Core and AI Edge devices all have integrated PCIe blocks, and most of them are PCIe Gen5 compliant. This means that there are no extra IP costs to connect an NVMe SSD to the Versal devices because everything you need is already built into the device.

So the question everyone asks is: what read/write speeds can we expect to get from an NVMe SSD connected to a Versal device? The answer to this question depends heavily on whether you use a hardware-based NVMe accelerator IP or not. Hardware NVMe accelerators, such as the NVMe Streamer, typically cost thousands of dollars, but from what I’ve seen, you will get peak performance from them. However, given that these accelerators don’t fit everyone’s budget, I’m going to answer this question with a simpler but flexible setup that doesn’t use an accelerator. In this setup, NVMe is implemented by software that is built into the Linux operating system, and as such, it does not require any paid IP. Another advantage of this system is that you can operate the SSDs using well known Linux commands, and we have the benefit of a file system that is managed by the embedded operating system.

To perform the tests, I’ve connected 2x Sabrent Rocket 1TB NVMe SSDs to the VEK280, and I’ve run some bash scripts to exercise the SSDs in PetaLinux. To connect the SSDs to the eval board, I’ve used the Opsero M.2 M-key Stack FMC. For the Vivado/PetaLinux project I’ve used the reference design for that FMC card which is hosted on Github. I’ve made available the pre-built SD card disk images for a few different Versal boards, so that anyone can replicate these results on their own setup.

Results

Let’s jump right into the speed test results and leave the rest of the post for those who want to replicate or understand how the tests were performed.

Versal AI Edge VEK280 + Sabrent Rocket

The “single SSD” tests involve reading/writing to a single SSD at a time. The “dual SSD” tests exercise two SSDs at a time. One interesting thing about the M.2 M-key Stack FMC is that it connects both SSDs to the Versal device through two independent GT quads and independent PCIe blocks, so the datapath of one does not impede the datapath of the other. As seen in the results, this allows us to (almost) double our effective read/write speeds, simply by accessing the SSDs through separate threads.

There we have the answer to our question, but to get some perspective, let’s make a few comparisons.

Comparison with Sabrent Rocket Advertised Performance

The table below shows the Sabrent Rocket SSD’s advertised performance. We’d need a hardware accelerator to get even close to these speeds, but if we consider those numbers to be the peak performance on a perfect test setup under ideal conditions, they at least give us an upper bound to compare our numbers to.

The chart below compares the Sabrent Rocket SSD performance measured on the VEK280 to the manufacturer’s advertised performance.

Comparison with Zynq UltraScale+

Now let’s compare these results to those I obtained by performing the same test on the Zynq UltraScale+ a few years ago. Note that I used a different SSD with the Zynq UltraScale+, it was the Samsung 970 EVO.

As you can see, the Versal setup achieved significantly better performance than the Zynq UltraScale+ setup. Allow me to speculate about the reasons behind the improved performance:

• Superior CPU:
  In these tests, NVMe is implemented by software - there is no hardware-based NVMe accelerator in the design. As such, the processor has a significant impact on the performance of each setup. Geared for AI/ML and other demanding high-performance applications, the Versal devices incorporate more powerful processors than the Zynq UltraScale+. The Versal’s Cortex-A72 processor has a speed rating that is more than twice that of the Zynq UltraScale+’s quad-core Arm Cortex-A53, based on a comparison of Arm processors. In these designs, we are also clocking the Versal’s processor at a higher frequency, with the APU of the VEK280 clocked at 1.4GHz, while the APU of the ZCU106 is being clocked at 1.2GHz.
• Faster PCIe:
  On the Versal VEK280, we had a PCIe Gen4 link (16GT/s x 4 lanes) versus a Gen3 link (8GT/s x 4 lanes) on the Zynq UltraScale+ ZCU106 setup. While this would have undoubtedly contributed to the difference in performance that was seen, I don’t think that it was a dominant factor. A 4-lane PCIe Gen3 interface has a bandwidth of about 1GByte/s per lane, for a total bandwidth of 4GBytes/s. It would be slightly less after overheads, but still much more than is needed for even the advertised speeds. One way to test this and remove the PCIe bandwidth from the equation would be to create a Versal design that implements only 2 lanes, so that the PCIe bandwidth between the two setups would be the same, at least theoretically. This is a test that I’ll have to leave for another time.
• Enhanced DMA?
  The DMA for PCI Express is implemented by the QDMA Subsystem IP in the Versal design, versus the XDMA Subsystem IP in the Zynq UltraScale+ design. We would expect the QDMA subsystem to outperform the XDMA subsystem due to it’s more advanced queuing architecture. However, in these designs, we’re using the QDMA/XDMA in Bridge mode, not DMA mode. The advanced queues of the QDMA are not used in bridge mode, so using the QDMA over the XDMA probably had little effect on the performance results.

Now let’s go into how to do this yourself.

Hardware Setup

It’s worth noting that if you want to perform this test yourself, you can use either the M.2 M-key Stack FMC or the FPGA Drive FMC Gen4. Either of those FMC cards will work with this reference design, and both of them support PCIe Gen4.

The first thing to do is to attach the NVMe SSDs to the M.2 slots on the M.2 M-key Stack FMC. Each SSD should be secured by a machine screw that is provided with the FMC card. It should look as shown in the image below:

With the SSDs secured, the M.2 M-key Stack FMC can be attached to the Versal eval board. You will also need to connect the power supply and the USB cable for the PetaLinux command line interface. Connect the other end of the USB cable to a PC on which you will run a UART terminal program. If you prefer to connect to the board via SSH, you can instead connect the Ethernet port of the eval board to your network router. In the case of the VEK280, the Ethernet port to use is the one that is right next to the USB connector, in the top right corner of the image below.

You might notice that the M.2 M-key Stack FMC has a carrier-side FMC connector on top - this can be used to connect a second FMC, such as the RPi Camera FMC or in fact any FMC that doesn’t need gigabit transceivers.

Prepare the SD card

Now we will prepare the SD card to boot from. From the table below you can download the pre-built SD card image for the target board that you are using. You will need an SD card that is at least 16GB in size.

If instead you would like to build this design from sources, you can follow the build instructions from the ref design user guide.

1. Download the compressed disk image file to your PC. Choose the one that corresponds to your Versal board.
2. Extract the .img file to your hard drive.
3. Apply the disk image to your SD card. In Windows, I use Win32DiskImager. In Ubuntu, you would use Disk Image Writer. Make sure that your SD card is plugged in, and that you have correctly selected it as the target disk.

4. Eject the SD card from your PC and plug it into your Versal board.

Launch PetaLinux

1. Open up a terminal console such as Putty and configure it for the UART port of the Versal board (speed 115200). The VEK280 has four UART ports over the single USB connection - use the first one.
2. Power up the board and wait for the PetaLinux boot sequence to complete.
3. Login to PetaLinux using the username petalinux. On your first time logging in, you will need to choose a password and confirm it.

Find and prepare the SSDs

To find the SSDs, we use the lsblk command:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ lsblk
NAME        MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
mtdblock0    31:0    0     1M  0 disk
mtdblock1    31:1    0    22M  0 disk
mtdblock2    31:2    0   256K  0 disk
mmcblk0     179:0    0  29.7G  0 disk
|-mmcblk0p1 179:1    0     1G  0 part /run/media/boot-mmcblk0p1
`-mmcblk0p2 179:2    0  28.7G  0 part /
nvme0n1     259:0    0 953.9G  0 disk
nvme1n1     259:1    0 953.9G  0 disk
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

From the above output, we can see that the SSDs have been recognized by PetaLinux but they haven’t been partitioned. Before we can run the speed tests, we’ll have to partition the SSDs, so we use fdisk for this. Let’s start with the first SSD:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo fdisk /dev/nvme0n1

Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.38.1).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them.
Be careful before using the write command.

Device does not contain a recognized partition table.
Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x1116ea63.

Command (m for help):

In the fdisk menu, I need to do the following:

• Type n for new partition
• Then type p and then 1 to create a new primary partition
• Use the defaults for the sector numbers
• Then type w to write the data to disk

Command (m for help): n
Partition type
   p   primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
   e   extended (container for logical partitions)
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1): 1
First sector (2048-2000409263, default 2048):
Last sector, +/-sectors or +/-size{K,M,G,T,P} (2048-2000409263, default 2000409263):

Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 953.9 GiB.

Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered.
C[ 5880.503950]  nvme0n1: p1
alling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
Syncing disks.

[ 5880.515194]  nvme0n1: p1
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

Now we need to get the name of the partition that we just created by running lsblk:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ lsblk
NAME        MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
mtdblock0    31:0    0     1M  0 disk
mtdblock1    31:1    0    22M  0 disk
mtdblock2    31:2    0   256K  0 disk
mmcblk0     179:0    0  29.7G  0 disk
|-mmcblk0p1 179:1    0     1G  0 part /run/media/boot-mmcblk0p1
`-mmcblk0p2 179:2    0  28.7G  0 part /
nvme0n1     259:0    0 953.9G  0 disk
`-nvme0n1p1 259:3    0 953.9G  0 part
nvme1n1     259:1    0 953.9G  0 disk
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

From that output I can see that the partition was named nvme0n1p1. Now I can create a file system on that partition using sudo mkfs -t ext2 /dev/nvme0n1p1.

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo mkfs -t ext2 /dev/nvme0n1p1
Password:
mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
Discarding device blocks: done
Creating filesystem with 250050902 4k blocks and 62513152 inodes
Filesystem UUID: cbaea2b8-4ff9-47c5-b65d-f812d95fd2ca
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
        32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208,
        4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872, 71663616, 78675968,
        102400000, 214990848

Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

Now we can create a directory for the partition and mount it to that directory:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo mkdir /run/media/nvme0n1p1
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 /run/media/nvme0n1p1/
[ 6183.932088] EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem
[ 6183.975784] EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p1): mounted filesystem cbaea2b8-4ff9-47c5-b65d-f812d95fd2ca r/w without journal. Quota mode: none.
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

We’ll need to repeat these steps for the second SSD, and once that’s done we should have two SSDs partitioned and mounted to the system. We can check this with lsblk:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ lsblk
NAME        MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
mtdblock0    31:0    0     1M  0 disk
mtdblock1    31:1    0    22M  0 disk
mtdblock2    31:2    0   256K  0 disk
mmcblk0     179:0    0  29.7G  0 disk
|-mmcblk0p1 179:1    0     1G  0 part /run/media/boot-mmcblk0p1
`-mmcblk0p2 179:2    0  28.7G  0 part /
nvme0n1     259:0    0 953.9G  0 disk
`-nvme0n1p1 259:3    0 953.9G  0 part /run/media/nvme0n1p1
nvme1n1     259:1    0 953.9G  0 disk
`-nvme1n1p1 259:2    0 953.9G  0 part /run/media/nvme1n1p1
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

We take note of the mount points for each of the SSDs, because we will need them to run the speed tests:

• SSD1 is mounted at /run/media/nvme0n1p1
• SSD2 is mounted at /run/media/nvme1n1p1

Just so you know, the next time you boot PetaLinux with these SSDs plugged in, they will automatically be mounted to the directories I used in this example.

Launch the speed tests

The bash scripts to run the speed tests are built into the PetaLinux projects, and you can find them in the /usr/bin directory. That directory is also in the path, so you can call the scripts from anywhere. Note that you must run the write tests before running the read tests, because the write tests create the file(s) to be read by the read tests.

Single SSD Write test

The single SSD write test writes a 4GB file to the SSD, and waits for the write to complete before calculating the time taken and the effective write speed. The script has one argument: the path of the mount location of the SSD to write to. Here is the output that I get:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo single_write_test.sh /run/media/nvme0n1p1/
Single SSD Write:
  - Data:  4000 MBytes
  - Delay: 3.31 seconds
  - Speed: 1208.46 MBytes/s

Single SSD Read test

The single SSD read test reads the 4GB file from the SSD, and waits for the read to complete before calculating the time taken and the effective read speed. This script also needs an argument specifying the mount location of the SSD to read from. Here is the output that I get:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo single_read_test.sh /run/media/nvme0n1p1/
Single SSD Read:
  - Data:  4000 MBytes
  - Delay: 1.71 seconds
  - Speed: 2339.18 MBytes/s

Dual SSD Write test

The dual SSD write test does the same as the single write test, however it runs the test on both SSDs, each on a separate thread. This script requires two arguments, specifying the mount locations of the SSDs to test. Below is the output that I get:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo dual_write_test.sh /run/media/nvme0n1p1/ /run/media/nvme1n1p1/
Dual SSD Write:
  - Data:  8000 MBytes
  - Delay: 3.39 seconds
  - Speed: 2359.88 MBytes/s

Dual SSD Read test

The dual SSD read test does the same as the single read test, however it runs the test on both SSDs, each on a separate thread. This script requires two arguments, specifying the mount locations of the SSDs to test. Below is the output that I get:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo dual_read_test.sh /run/media/nvme0n1p1/ /run/media/nvme1n1p1/
Dual SSD Read:
  - Data:  8000 MBytes
  - Delay: 1.81 seconds
  - Speed: 4419.89 MBytes/s

Check the link speed

That’s all there is to the test, but while we’re here, you might want to know what the PCIe link speed is. We can do this using sudo lspci -vv. Below I have passed the output through egrep just to show the relevant information:

vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$ sudo lspci -vv | egrep ':00.0|LnkSta:'
0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Xilinx Corporation Device b0b4 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
                LnkSta: Speed 16GT/s, Width x4
0000:01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Phison Electronics Corporation Device 5021 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
                LnkSta: Speed 16GT/s, Width x4
0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Xilinx Corporation Device b0b4 (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
                LnkSta: Speed 16GT/s, Width x4
0001:01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Phison Electronics Corporation Device 5021 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
                LnkSta: Speed 16GT/s, Width x4
vek280-fpgadrv-2024-1:~$

On my setup we can see that the Sabrent SSDs have linked up at PCIe Gen4 speeds (16GT/s x 4 lanes).

Future tests and improvements

• Data validation:
  In these tests, we write and read the data, but there is no data validation - we don’t check the data to make sure that what was written was actually written and not corrupted. In a future post, I’ll implement a solution for this.
• Benchmarking tool:
  Using dd to measure NVMe performance as we’re doing here can give us a ballpark figure for read/write speed, but how confident can we be in the results? What are the factors influencing the results? The throughput measured with dd can vary significantly as we change the input parameters used (eg. block size and block count). What parameters should we be using? A better solution would be to use a benchmarking tool that is built for the purpose of measuring what we need to measure, such as sysbench. I’ll use this tool in a future post.
• Real-world application:
  How will these results translate to a real-world application? We hope that they translate 1:1 with a real-world application, but often we don’t know until we’ve built something that more closely resembles the application. In a future post I’m going to create an application that is more typical of what we might want to achieve in the real world. For example, generating samples in the PL, storing them in the SSD and vice versa.

What speeds are you getting?

If you’re trying this out for yourself, and you’re using a different Versal board or SSD, I’d really like to hear about your results. If you would like to share them, please email me with details about your setup.